RELIGIOUS AND ISLAMIC STUDIES

The Role of French Islamic Studies and Arabic Studies in the Development of Scientific Knowledge

Vol. 89 No. 3 (2021), RELIGIOUS AND ISLAMIC STUDIES
Vol. 89 No. 3 (2021)
2021-09-26 Number of views: 136
Наталья Сейтахметова
Институт философии, политологии и религиоведения КН МОН РК
Zhanar Turganbayeva
Institute for Philosophy, Political Science and Religius Studies of the CS MES RK e-mail: zhanara0890@mail.ru

Keywords

Islamic Studies, Dialogue, Identity, Orientalism, Islamic Comparative Studies, French Islamic Studies Experience

Abstract

French Islamic studies, which have traditionally been at the forefront of humanitarian knowledge, have experienced their ups and downs: Orientalism generated by the era of the Crusades, colonial politics and the postcolonial period of the crisis of recovery, in which migrants live, “border” on the once advanced concept of multiculturalism, the search for an inclusive education and tolerant social and labor policies.

Scientists note that the historiographic works of the early 20th century authored by French researchers focus on the negative consequences of the Arab-Muslim conquests for the development of the classical culture of the North African region. Later, with the study of the intellectual heritage of Muslim cultural figures, scientific knowledge came to understand the role of Islamic culture in ensuring the preservation of ancient traditions and the continuous development of humanistic thought.

Historiographic and geopolitical work has been replaced by interdisciplinary research based on a cross-cultural approach. In this regard, Islamic scholarly discourse is enriched by the research of Muslim authors who speak Arabic, Turkish, Farsi, who are able to reveal the problems under study related to Islam from the inside, and not from the standpoint of subject-object relations.

How to Cite

Сейтахметова, Н., & Turganbayeva, Z. (2021). The Role of French Islamic Studies and Arabic Studies in the Development of Scientific Knowledge. Adam Alemi, 89(3), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.48010/2021.3/1999-5849.15