ФИЛОСОФСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ В КЛАССИЧЕСКОМ И ПОСТНЕКЛАССИЧЕСКОМ ДИСКУРСАХ

FALSAFIC WORLDVIEW OF THE KAZAKH COMMUNITY

Vol. 103 No. 1 (2025), ФИЛОСОФСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ В КЛАССИЧЕСКОМ И ПОСТНЕКЛАССИЧЕСКОМ ДИСКУРСАХ
Vol. 103 No. 1 (2025)
2025-03-31 Number of views: 0
Нурсултан Дуйсен
Eurasian National University named after L.N. Gumilyov e-mail: Nurs_db@mail.ru

Keywords

Kazakh philosophy
falsafa
myth
religion
worldview
national thinking
folk philosophy

Abstract

This article examines the issues of the emergence and development of Kazakh philosophy, the ideological views of the Kazakh community and the traditions of national thinking. Kazakh philosophy and the national outlook of the Kazakh people is one of the most important components of the country’s history. It reflects the process of scientific cognition and the ideological search of the people, the rich history and identity of national thinking. From this point of view, the article stated that Kazakh philosophy is a great basis and methodological tool for a comprehensive understanding of the history of our people. Therefore, the inability to comprehend the history, political ideology, art, literature, moral principles, religiosity, etc. of Kazakh science without studying and studying it became the subject of the article.
Kazakh philosophy, closely connected with the national liberation movement of the people, is distinguished not only by its scientific value, but also by its high civic qualities, direct search for ways to achieve social justice, and fruitful achievements. Kazakh philosophy is an expression of the spiritual and cultural independence of the country and the spiritual support of the internal unity of the Kazakh community. It is also known that it is an integral part of the world philosophy that has developed over the centuries in the history of mankind. The study of the philosophical and public opinion of the Kazakh people began from the beginning of the XX century.

How to Cite

Дуйсен, Н. (2025). FALSAFIC WORLDVIEW OF THE KAZAKH COMMUNITY. Adam Alemi, 103(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.48010/aa.v103i1.517