DOI:
10.48010/m5fsv116Keywords
Hate Speech, Symbolic Violence, Ethnicity, Identity, Social Alienness, Digital Discourse, Instagram, Kazakhstani Society
This article examines the problem of the escalation of interethnic “hate speech” within Kazakhstan’s digital discourse, with a particular focus on the Instagram platform. The central research problem lies in the destabilization of social consensus as social media transform into spaces of uncontrolled transmission of symbolic violence and the dehumanization of the “Other.” The author argues that contemporary digital platforms function not only as means of communication but also as instruments of “identity policing,” where strategies of internal exclusion (stigmatization based on linguistic and cultural markers) deepen existing sociocultural divides.
The author’s theoretical and methodological framework is grounded in an understanding of hate speech as a systemic discursive process of reality construction. Drawing on the concepts of Benedict Anderson and Pierre Bourdieu, the author contends that aggressive speech acts in the digital sphere reflect ongoing struggles for social domination and the legitimation of exclusive forms of identity within a multiethnic society.
As possible solutions to the identified problem, the article proposes a shift from reactive technical moderation toward the implementation of a comprehensive socio-political strategy. The author substantiates the need for the systematic reduction of social frustration factors, which serve as primary triggers of aggression in the digital environment, the introduction of preventive mechanisms for fostering a new digital ethics and media literacy, and the adaptation of state policies on social cohesion to the conditions of rapid technological transformation of the media landscape.
1 DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Kazakhstan. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-kazakhstan
2 NapoleonCat. (2024). Instagram users in Kazakhstan – April 2024. https://napoleoncat.com/stats
3 Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130
4 Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
5 Anderson, B. (2001). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
6 Bourdieu, P. (2007). Language and symbolic power. Polity Press.
7 Nysanbaev, A. N., Dunaev, V. Yu., Kosichenko, A. G., & Kurganskaya, V. D. (2010). Rol’ SMI v konsolidatsii kazakhstanskogo obshchestva [The role of mass media in the consolidation of Kazakhstani society]. Komp’yuterno-izdatel’skiy tsentr Instituta filosofii i politologii MON RK. (In Russian)
8 Kazakov, Yu. (2002). Mezhdu «chto delat’…» i «chto delat’?» Pressa i obshchestvo v situatsii povyshennogo riska [Between “what should be done…” and “what should be done?”: The press and society in a situation of heightened risk]. In A. M. Verkhovskiy (Ed.), Yazyk moy… problema etnicheskoy i religioznoy neterpimosti v rossiyskikh SMI [My language… the problem of ethnic and religious intolerance in the Russian media] (p. 127). ROO “Tsentr ‘Panorama’”. (In Russian)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Жаннат Досхожина, Ермек Токтаров