ISSN 1999-5849 (Print) · eISSN 2959-7544 (Online)

TEACHING ENGLISH THROUGH THE PHILOSOPHY OF CRITICAL PEDAGOGY: A THEORETICAL-CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND PROPOSED RESEARCH DESIGN FOR THE FREIREAN APPROACH IN THE KAZAKHSTANI EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT

Authors

  • Aibolat Nabidullin Michigan State University
  • Tulegen Merkibayev Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Gulsim Nurekeshova Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Meruyert Tastemir Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48010/fvdnrr58

Keywords:

Critical Pedagogy, English Language Teaching, Dialogic Education, Problem-Posing, Emancipatory Learning, Higher Education

Abstract

Freirean critical pedagogy, as theorized in Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed, represents one of the most philosophically generative traditions in education — yet its implications for English language teaching in postcolonial and transitional contexts remain substantially underexplored in Kazakhstani scholarship and insufficiently implemented in Kazakhstani pedagogical practice. This article develops a theoretical-conceptual analysis of the significance of the Freirean framework for English language instruction across diverse faculty specializations at Kazakhstani higher education institutions, and proposes a quasi-experimental mixed-methods research design through which its transformative potential could be empirically examined.
Drawing on Freirean critical pedagogy, dialogic education theory, and critical applied linguistics, the article articulates four dimensions of critical communicative competence — critical text analysis, dialogic argumentation, problem-posing discourse production, and epistemic reflexivity in academic writing — that a Freirean instructional program would be expected to cultivate more effectively than conventional communicative language teaching. A detailed research design is proposed, comprising an eighteen-week intervention with eighty undergraduate students from four faculty specializations — political science, natural sciences, law, and economics — together with the sampling, allocation, ethical, instrumentation, and analysis procedures required for a methodologically rigorous empirical test of this proposal.
The article situates the proposed Kazakhstani design within a comparative review of critical-pedagogy-informed English programs in the United States, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and Finland, drawn from published literature, and identifies the institutional adaptations that would be necessary for the Freirean approach to be implemented systematically in the post-Soviet Kazakhstani context. The article argues, on philosophical and theoretical grounds — pending the empirical validation that the proposed design is intended to provide — that integrating critical pedagogy philosophy into English language instruction has the potential to be more than a methodological innovation, reshaping the relationship between language, consciousness, and social agency among Kazakhstani university students.

References

1 Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.

2 Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Bergin & Garvey.

3 McLaren, P. (2000). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the pedagogy of revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

4 Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. Seabury Press.

5 Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (R. R. Barr, Trans.). Continuum.

6 Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

7 Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press.

8 Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.

9 Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Longman.

10 Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.

11 van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.

12 Auerbach, E. R., & Wallerstein, N. (1987). ESL for action: Problem-posing at work. Addison-Wesley.

13 Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Context, community, and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588001

14 Gadotti, M. (1996). Paulo Freire: Uma biobibliografia [Paulo Freire: A Bio-Bibliography]. Cortez; Instituto Paulo Freire; UNESCO. (In Portuguese)

15 Niemi, H. (2012). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 19–38). Sense Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY. CULTURE. EDUCATION

How to Cite

TEACHING ENGLISH THROUGH THE PHILOSOPHY OF CRITICAL PEDAGOGY: A THEORETICAL-CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND PROPOSED RESEARCH DESIGN FOR THE FREIREAN APPROACH IN THE KAZAKHSTANI EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT. (2026). Adam Alemi, 28(4 (110), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.48010/fvdnrr58